How the Democrats Win Big in 2024, Part 1: The Candidates

History shows that revolutions are most successful when the target society has these problems: a) a decline in the public moral values that once was its strength; b) chaos stimulated by hatred; c) confusion caused by false data; d) the society split into warring factions; e) a convenient, visible target to blame for the current problems; and f) an immediate proximate cause that convinces the public that the revolutionaries have the solution.  The 2024 election will be another step in promoting these, same as all the others since the first truly “revolutionary” election of 1992. It was in that year that the Democratic Party first put into action its long-term goal of reducing America to a third-rate socialist nation ruled by oligarchs and their cronies.  It was during the Clinton administration that the mainstream media became a subsidiary of the Democratic Party and the federal bureaucracy began to work against the liberties of the people.  As the late Peter Jennings (1938-2005) once observed, the mainstream media had replaced news reporting with advocacy.

Here is my opinion on how the Democrats win big in Nov 2024, despite current polls showing that the American people are angry at the Biden administration and local Democratic governments for their failures, corruption, and general incompetence.  This is likely to be a coat-tails election; the winning Presidential candidate will induce many victories for those in their party throughout the down-ticket offices, possibly including local offices.  Here is my assessment of how the Democrats will operate during this election cycle, and how they win big unless the Republicans and Independents adopt a new way of campaigning. This first essay addresses the respective presidential candidates promoted by the respective parties.

1          The Presidential Candidates

1.1        Democrat Presidential Candidate

It appears at this point that President Biden will run for re-election along with Vice President Kamala Harris, despite their current unpopularity.  Actually it doesn’t matter who the Democrats nominate for President. They have several strong candidates to replace Biden, should that become politically necessary or advantageous, since Biden can be replaced by the Democratic Party “super delegates” at their Convention under the Democratic Party’s current nominating rules.  If so, the most likely replacements are California Governor Gavin Newsom, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy, and New York Governor Kathy Hochul.  All are known socialists; all have a proven track record of abuse of power during the Wuhan virus pandemic; all have a proven track record of incompetence; and all have been recently re-elected.  The second-tier replacements are probably former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former First Lady Michelle Obama, and current Vice President Kamala Harris.  All seven are carbon copies of Obama and Biden; there will not be a single policy change should any of them replace Biden as the Presidential candidate.  Biden is therefore eminently expendable; but whether he will actually be replaced at the Democratic Convention depends on events as yet unforeseen.  I suspect the Democratic Party elite would prefer to promote a candidate by which they can pretend a total separation from Biden.  That would exclude the last two; but never count out a Clinton when it comes to grasping for power.  President Biden is certainly in no legal trouble: he and the mainstream media will continue to cover for him no matter what evidence of bribery, tax evasion, and influence-selling crimes are uncovered. As for his son Hunter Biden, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre recently stated that the President will not pardon his son.  That is correct, most likely because either: a) Joe Biden has already pardoned Hunter and his associates (and himself); he simply hasn’t made it public yet; or b) there is plenty of time to issue the pardons after the election when Jean-Pierre’s comments “are no longer operative”.

1.2        Republican Presidential Candidate

The leading candidate as of now is clearly former President Donald Trump.  He remains popular with a large segment of the Republican and Independent voters.  However, he will have so many legal problems it will be difficult to run a good campaign (even if he is acquitted or the trials do not begin).  If he gets convicted, his support will decline.  His remaining competitors are Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie; former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, former Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson, and businessman Vivek Ramaswamy.  The most qualified of the remaining candidates to replace Trump (should he be imprisoned or bogged down in unending court appearances) is Governor DeSantis, but so far his campaign has failed to gain traction.  It appears at present that the two most likely to win the nomination in case of President Trump’s absence are Governor Haley followed by Governor Christie.  Also, these same two will likely come in second place in various States should Trump be able to continue.  Haley and Christie are favored as Republican candidates for President by the New York Times, and thus by the rest of the mainstream media, since: a) they are both known quantities; b) are favorites of the Republican old guard; and c) have policies that are considerably watered down compared to Trump and DeSantis.

Mr. Trump has another difficulty should he be able to continue to run.  Recall how Mr. Trump got the nomination in 2016: he ran against a large number of other candidates (upward of 10) and therefore was able to win all the delegates in some States by getting 25 or 30% of the vote.  Trump is now running against a much smaller field, and is now faced with the task of getting closer to 40% of the vote, a much different circumstance than in 2016.

On 19 Dec 2023 the Colorado Supreme Court cast Mr. Trump off the Colorado primary ballot on the grounds (in their opinion, without trial) that Mr. Trump led an “insurrection” on 6 Jan 2021, and is therefore disqualified per the 14th Amendment.  The same thing was done by the Secretary of State in Maine; again, no trial and no conviction.  The interesting thing about these rulings is that it claimed that Mr. Trump is disqualified from being President at all; being cast off the ballot was an incidental consequence.  Four other States have already ruled otherwise (at least for the primary).  It remains to be seen whether the Colorado and Maine rulings will stand under review by the U. S. Supreme Court.  The bigger problem is whether the various States will cast President Trump off the ballot in the general election, should he be the Republican nominee.  I suspect that these primary ballot challenges are merely test cases for the real Democratic Party objective if Mr. Trump is the Republican nominee: remove him from the general election ballot and force him to run as a write-in candidate (guaranteed to lose).

1.3        The Democratic Party Approach

The Democratic Party will use its powers of hatred, fear, and chaos to promote their candidate.  First will be hatred for those voters who believe in traditional (i.e., “obsolete”) values. Second will be fear of a “conservative”, by falsely claiming that a Republican will destroy the rights of racial minorities, re-institute slavery, round up gays and lesbians for persecution, and decimate the “safety net” (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and the various welfare programs).  Third, the Democrats will maximize chaos by claiming that all Republicans are “insurrectionists” that should be outlawed and imprisoned.  That tactic will include legal challenges in the court (pressure from above), and riots in the streets by BLM and ANTIFA (pressure from below).  The Democrats will claim that any Republican is a threat to democratic institutions.  The Democrats will say it; the mainstream media, academia, Hollywood, and the social media empires will continuously chant it; the artificial intelligence algorithms will enhance it; and the federal bureaucracy will confirm it.  The people will believe it and vote accordingly … unless the Republicans find a backbone and figure out how to counter this Marxist propaganda.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Mohammed’s Maggots Strike Israel

I recounted in a previous essay the attacks by Mohammed’s Maggots on the people of France in Nov 2015 [1]:

“The operational wing of the underside of Islam conducted their well-advertised attack against the residents of Paris on 13 Nov 2015, focusing on the innocent and the unprepared.  This attack came only ten months after a similar one against the French satirical publication Charlie Hebdo.  It proves that although the Hebdo attack led the French authorities to step up their preparedness against terrorism, something isn’t working since this one caught them off-guard again.  French President Francois Hollande promptly and accurately characterized it as “an act of war”, and promised that France would return the favor.  Meanwhile, U. S. President Barack “I lied, period” Obama took a break from a fund-raiser long enough to give the attacks two solid harrumphs at a news conference, issuing the standard drivel in his normal Commander Obvious way: “this was an attack on the civilized world”.  As usual, he declined to name the enemy.”

I concluded that essay with some bad news for France:

“France has two problems.  The obvious first one is with the Maggots; the second is with its limp-wristed allies.” 

The HAMAS branch of Mohammed’s Maggots managed to evade detection by Israeli intelligence, and conducted a very large scale attack against Israel 7 Oct 2023.  According to reliable sources, they inflicted about 1,400 casualties, many more injured, and about 240 or so hostages taken from Israel to Gaza, among which are about 15 or 20 Americans.  Among the casualties and hostages were infants and elderly ladies, some of whom survived the Nazi movement of the 1940’s.  Israel’s military (The Israeli Defense Force, IDF) has since begun operations in Gaza, with the stated goal of “eliminating HAMAS”.

As usual, Israel finds itself nearly alone in the world.  First, most of its so-called allies have remained silent except for the obligatory but meaningless “we regret the loss of life” and “we sympathize with the families of the victims”.  Secondly, the success of this attack (in which HAMAS discovered the use of air power) only served to encourage the latent world-wide anti-Semitism, especially in America’s mainstream news organizations.  Nearly all are sympathetic to the Palestinian return-the-land-and-eliminate-Israel movement or are openly supporting the Maggots themselves.  Anti-Semitism has gotten bad enough due to inculcation at U. S. colleges that students and professors are accusing Israel of war crimes simply for responding to an attack on its population.  No one would believe it if it weren’t on video.  Third, the U. S. has promised to aid Israel with military assistance and supplies, while at the same time giving millions for “humanitarian purposes” to the Palestinian in Gaza, which of course goes straight into HAMAS’ coffers.  That policy shows that the Biden administration is either: a) fundamentally hypocritical, naive, gullible, and incompetent; or b) siding the enemy of our ally, Israel.  President Joe “Wimpy” Biden himself has warned Israel to “obey the rules of warfare”.  From the Israeli standpoint, this overall policy position cannot be too reassuring that the U. S. will follow through on its promises. Fourth, the Jewish people have an internal problem: some Jews favor a “cease-fire” in order to avoid civilian casualties in Gaza; in fact they disrupted an official U. S. Congressional proceeding to make their point of view known (for which they were praised by the press). 

But there is another problem just as important as the first four; namely, the Israeli government has once again opened up the dusty old law books, and tried to obey the rules of the civilized Western world, justifying their actions in light of what public opinion regards as acceptable in this situation.  It is time for the Israeli government, and the Jewish people in general to accept the facts on the ground:

a. The only support Jewish people get are from nations who recognize that the promise of Genesis 12:3 is still in effect, whether a nation called Israel exists or not.  The number of nations fitting that description is small (the U. S., Great Britain, Australia, sometimes France, and sometimes a few others in Europe).  There is no near-term fix.

b. The people of Gaza do not all support HAMAS, but the fact is that majority of them voted to include HAMAS as part of their government in 2005.  HAMAS is an ideological Marxist outfit that claims to be the true interpreter of Islam; once they gained power, there were no more elections.  It doesn’t matter what fraction of the Gaza residents support HAMAS; they are stuck with them as a government.

c. Both sides have made impossible demands: Israel demands that HAMAS unconditionally surrender, hand over all the hostages and all their weapons.  That is never going to happen.  HAMAS has demanded that Israel case to exist and the Jews either evacuate the Middle East or be killed.  That is not going to happen either.  So, there is no basis for negotiating on either side; this conflict will be ended militarily, same as it started.  The best that Israel can hope for is to reduce the HAMAS Maggot organization/government to small size, but expect it to eventually rise again.

d. The hostages are valuable to HAMAS for four reasons.  The first is to drive a wedge between the U. S. and Israel centering on the debate as to how to get them back. Secondly, placing the hostages in near proximity to HAMAS outposts, headquarters, and the tunnel system will serve to restrain the Israelis from attacking them.  Third, if the American hostages can be transferred to Iran, they are worth about $1,000,000,000 each in ransom, as recent events have proven.  Fourth, killing them will be useful propaganda material for the Maggots, even if they lose the war.  It is highly likely that most of the hostages are going to end up dead, except in cases where releasing them gives HAMAS time to regroup or supplies them with a propaganda victory.

e. Israel as a nation has already lost the propaganda war.  The mainstream news organizations and academia worldwide are siding with the HAMAS Maggots as against Israel.  There is no practical counter to this problem, as it took thirty years of propaganda and inculcation to produce it.  The Jewish people generally have also lost the propaganda war because the news organizations and academia worldwide support the Palestinian people as against Jewish people.  There is no near-term solution for this problem either, for the same reason.  The United Nations is a joke; Israel is wasting its time even attending.  There is no point in arguing with an assembly of anti-Semitic kleptomaniac dictators and other babbling morons.  The application is that Israel as a nation will be accused of anything and everything by the mainstream media, social media, academia, and the United Nations, so long as it makes Israel look like the villain, and Judaism its motivating philosophy.  No false allegation will be too much for the mainstream media in the U. S. to foment and repeat.

f. The “civilized rules of warfare”, in which professional military fights professional military, is unique to the Western world (the nations of North and South America, Great Britain, Europe, Israel, Russia, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and a few others).  All the other nations fight the Oriental way: population against population.  That would include nearly all the Asian nations; and certainly includes Iran and the various Maggot organizations that it finances (Hezbollah and HAMAS).  Unfortunately for Israel, the Biden administration is pro-Iran, meaning it will look the other way as Iran continues to support the Maggots.  Here is the thing about the “civilized rules of war”: they apply only as long as both sides observe them.  When the Germans attacked French and English civilians in World War II, the rules came off: the Allies then could attack German civilians and the civilians of their allies, the Italians and Japanese.  The application here is: HAMAS is the official military institution of the Gaza strip; since it has attacked Israeli civilians, Israel should not have too much concern about Palestinian civilians.  If the Maggots choose to fight Oriental style, so be it.  The result will be a large number of casualties among the Gaza residents, and of course, an infinite amount of whimpering about it.

References

1.  Edward D. Duvall, “Mohammed’s Maggots Attack Paris”, 15 Nov 2015

Tags: ,
Posted in terrorism | No Comments »

A Summary of the Durham Report

John Durham was tasked to investigate the activities of the FBI during the 2016 Presidential election, and to determine how the “Trump-Russia collusion” allegations were handled. Mr. Durham’s report is 306 pages long, and presents the results of his investigation by category rather than a continuous timeline. The enclosed pdf shows the events in chronological order, which I believe gives a clear picture of what all the various player were up to.

Thanks for reading,

EDD

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

I am pleased to announce the release of the second edition of The Control and Manipulation of Money.

It is available for free in pdf format at https://www.fremontvalleybooks.com

It is also available in print format at Barnes & Noble and other online bookstores: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-control-and-manipulation-of-money-edward-d-duvall/1143739227

Thanks for reading,

EDD

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »