Archive for the ‘terrorism’ Category

Real World Graduation: Question 24

RealWorldGraduation_Question_24   <– PDF

Why do famous Islamic leaders such as Osama bin Laden and Yassir Arafat never volunteer to personally undertake suicide bomber missions?

a) They are well educated in the will of Allah, and therefore are more valuable to Allah directing the work of others.

b) They serve as an inspiration to all Moslems, and therefore it is important that they continue to sacrifice in this life for the spreading of Islam, rather than taking the easy way out by transferring immediately to paradise in a suicide bombing.

c) The leaders of Islam receive special revelation from Prophet Mohammed himself, and he told them that it is not their time yet.

d) They cannot remember which button to push.

e) The answer is some combination of a), b), and c).

(The answer is shown on p. 2 of the PDF.)

Tags: ,
Posted in critical thinking, Real World Graduation, terrorism | No Comments »

Barack H. Obama’s Legacy, Part 10

ObamaLegacyPart10   <– PDF

Continuing an analysis of Mr. Obama’s Middle East policy, it is obvious that he, like his predecessor Mr. Bush, failed to understand the source of “Islamic terrorism”.  Actually, it is worse than that.  At least Mr. Bush was willing to call it what it was: a certain branch of Islam that adheres to the original definition of ‘jihad’ as handed down by the Prophet Mohammed and his immediate successors.  That is, anyone who is not a particular type of devout Moslem has to be killed in the service of Allah.  Mr. Obama, sympathetic to Islam, and also convinced that America is first and foremost an oppressor and exploiter nation, declined to admit that the problem was even related to the Islamic religion.  Instead, he and the members of his administration referred to the work of al Qaeda and ISIS using euphemisms such as ‘workplace violence’, ‘personal issues’, ‘hate crimes’, or whatever he could get the compliant media to repeat.  He went so far at one point to deny that ISIS (which established an Islamic Caliphate) was even Islamic.

The incorrect policy pursued by Mr. Obama, imitating somewhat the policy of Mr. Bush, was to enlist the Arab nations in a coalition against the terrorist group. As expected, none of them did much.  The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is not part of the solution to Islamic based terrorism. Saudi Arabia is the problem with Islamic terrorism.  The Saudi royal family maintains it power by allowing the Wahhabi sect of Sunni Islam to control the subjects by a religious secret police that also controls the legal system and the education system.  (The Wahhabi’s prefer to be called Salafi.) The Saudi royal family supports and defends the Wahhabi sect as the de facto national religion and in return the Wahhabi’s educate the subjects that they are obligated to support the House of Saud.

The Wahhabi sect is the one branch of Islamic “theology” that has revived the original definition of ‘jihad’ as a viable political and religious system, hence the cause by Al Qaeda, ISIS, and many other like groups to enforce their objectives: a) kill as many Jewish people as possible; b) force the U. S. and other Western nations out of Middle Eastern affairs; c) establish a Caliphate to emulate the grand position once held by the early successors of the Prophet Mohammed (they had conquered vast tracts of the Middle East, Northern Africa, and Spain); and d) use the power of the Caliphate to kill anyone who embraced any other system of faith, starting with Christians. To do that, it is necessary for them to gain control of the Middle East using the terror methods to intimidate the Arab dictatorships, whom they accuse of being too closely aligned with the evil West.  It is notable that they have never attempted any terrorist activity inside Saudi Arabia: it is too soon to attack their current protectors.  The Saudi royal family claimed to be opposed to ISIS, but they never put a division in the field or a squadron in the air against them.

Mr. Obama’s policy of tilting toward Iran as an American favorite was poorly received in Saudi Arabia, as Islamic Republic of Iran and Saudi Arabia regard each other as mortal enemies.  But the capitulation to Iran’s demands did not deter Mr. Obama from continuing to advocate for weapons sales to Saudi Arabia, as well as confirmations of security agreements made in the past.  Why did he do that?  Because ISIS had gotten stronger in late 2013 and early 2014, and started making noises that they might like to attack Saudi Arabia and remove the royal family.  The House of Saud realized there was no prospect of an alliance with ISIS so they turned to the U. S. for protection, and Mr. Obama came through.  He then began to attack ISIS positions and towns controlled by ISIS, and with it the inevitable collateral damage in the form of civilian casualties.  Those casualties only served ISIS’ propaganda methods, by which they induced more young impressionable idiots to join with them and fight against America, the great Christian evil.

In the end, Mr. Obama he affirmed that the Saudi policy of supporting Wahhabism has no opponents in his administration. On the other hand, his support for Iran and his reluctance to attack Syrian President Assad made the Saudi regime uneasy.  In other words, Mr. Obama acted against a traditional ally’s interests, while ingratiating himself with Iran, Saudi’s greatest enemy.  He dug himself deeper into the moral and political cesspool known as the Middle East, reducing the U. S. to a position of being hated as either an infidel or an unreliable enemy.  Meanwhile, Wahhabism continues to be endorsed by the Saudi regime.

Tags: ,
Posted in terrorism, Uncategorized | No Comments »

The Peace of Islam Visits the UK

PeaceOfIslamVisitsUK   <– PDF

Mohammed’s Maggots continue their actions in Great Britain to promote peace and understanding according to the Islamic tradition.  On 22 March 2017, five people were killed in Westminster by a member of the Smiling Jihad who ran people over with a vehicle and then stabbed several others, causing six fatalities and 40 injuries.  On 22 May 2017, another loving Moslem set off a bomb at a concert venue in Manchester, killing 22 and injuring 120 or so.  On 3 Jun 2017 it was three of Allah’s loyal servants running people over on London Bridge and then stabbing whoever they could.  There were seven fatalities and 48 injured.  In response to this last attack, British Prime Minister Theresa May issued a statement (1.5 official harrumphs – serious indeed):

“Since the emergence of the threat from Islamist-inspired terrorism our country has made significant progress in disrupting plots and protecting the public. But it is time to say enough is enough.  We cannot and must not pretend that things can continue as they are.”

I am not a subject of the Queen, so it is not my place to criticize the U.K.’s policies.  But I can put this into an American perspective.  We have a certain number of Mohammed’s Maggots in the U.S., just as in the U. K., allowed here because our bureaucrats and politicians, like in the U. K., believe that all cultures and all religions are equal.  They have failed to realize that Islam was founded as a political religion, designed by Mohammed to get the Arab tribes to cast off their petty gods and idols, and give allegiance to one big idol (Allah), thus uniting the squabbling Arab tribes into a potent military and political force.  In the first century of its existence, the Arab tribes under the spell of Islam successfully conquered the entire Middle East except Persia, all of northern Africa, and what is now Spain (it was then called the Kingdom of the Visigoths).  Because our politicians regard all cultures and religions as equal, they are not willing to recognize that Islam is at war with both Western culture and any religion that is not Islamic.

Now that a certain number of them are in the U. S., our ever-spineless government officials treat the Islamic threat as just another series of crimes.  They are afraid to offend the Moslems; instead attempt to rationalize their actions.  Our former federal administration would not even admit the existence of Islamic “peace” until a month before it left office.  It is a true lesson of history: if you treat acts of war like crimes, you will lose the war.  The people of the U. K. have been victimized many times in recent years, and it is likely that we in the U. S. will eventually experience the same thing, given the pansy-style approach adopted by our leaders.  Sooner or later we Americans will corral our politicians and bureaucrats and demand of them, “When are you clowns going to get off your fat lazy lard-asses, and do your damn job to get Mohammed’s Maggots out of our country?”

When that day comes, the political and bureaucratic wimpy-boys will laugh in our faces, and tell us: a) there’s nothing to worry about; b) it is only a minor crime wave; c) Islamophobia is not a viable policy, and d) we can’t kill our way out of this problem. Their rationale is obvious: none of the attacks by Mohammed’s Maggots affect them personally.  Neither Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Nancy Pelosi, Dianne Feinstein, Chuck Schumer, Mitch McConnell, John McCain, Paul Ryan or any of their family members will ever be affected by anything the enemy does, being protected at all times by a dozen guards with machine guns.  It is only the slime-slurping bottom-dwelling taxpayer lowlifes like us that get blown up, shot, stabbed, and run over by the true Islamic faithful.  Therefore, there is no cause for alarm.

I am pretty certain of how things will go up to that point. What happens when they laugh in our faces is too hard to predict.

Tags: ,
Posted in terrorism | No Comments »

Mohammed’s Maggots Attack Paris

PDF version –>  MohammedsMaggots_20151115

The operational wing of the underside of Islam conducted their well-advertised attack against the residents of Paris on 13 Nov 2015, focusing on the innocent and the unprepared.  This attack came only ten months after a similar one against the French satirical publication Charlie Hebdo.  It proves that although the Hebdo attack led the French authorities to step up their preparedness against terrorism, something isn’t working since this one caught them off-guard again.  French President Francois Hollande promptly and accurately characterized it as “an act of war”, and promised that France would return the favor.  Meanwhile, U. S. President Barack “I lied, period” Obama took a break from a fund-raiser long enough to give the attacks two solid harrumphs at a news conference, issuing the standard drivel in his normal Commander Obvious way: “this was an attack on the civilized world”.  As usual, he declined to name the enemy.

So it turns out that Mr. Hollande has the will but not the military means.  Mr. Obama has the military means but not the will.  But by combining forces, and with careful negotiations guaranteed not to offend anyone, a Western alliance with neither the will nor the means will be established to fight the Maggots.  Therefore, the Maggots will continue to grow and fester, laying plans to expand their malignancy to other parts of the Western world.  It is likely that Paris is a mere prototype.

Mr. Obama is now at the G-20 Conference in Turkey, conferring in a side meeting with that paragon of virtue and liberty, Russian President Putin.  Syria is engaged in a multi-facetted civil war: the current government led by President Bashar al-Assad, several local groups hoping to depose him and establish something else (we know not what), and ISIS (Mohammed’s Maggots).  Mr. Putin’s goal is to defend and protect his Middle Eastern ally, Mr. Assad.  To do so, Russian forces are fighting against groups opposed to Mr. Assad, except ISIS.   To expect Mr. Putin to devote his attention to ISIS as an aid to France seems logical only to the delusional Mr. Obama. If the Maggots do expand their operation, it will be other nation’s problems as well, but not Russia’s.  The Maggots are smart enough not to attack Russia directly.  They took down a Russian plane in the Sinai as an attack against Egypt’s economy, not against Russia.  This is perfectly understandable to Mr. Putin: it is the long-standing tactic of Communists everywhere, and besides, imitation is the most sincere form of flattery.  The conclusion is that the response to the Paris attack is France’s problem; they should expect no material assistance from Russia, the U. S., or other Europeans.

I would advise France not to rely on Saudi Arabia for assistance either.  Let’s not forget that ISIS came from al-Qaeda, and al-Qaeda came from Wahabism, which is the official state-sponsored religion of Saudi Arabia.  Saudi Arabia has not and will not fight ISIS, even though they are in the immediate neighborhood, as it is not polite to bomb your allies.  The goal of the House of Saud is to buy time and ultimately share power with the Maggot Caliphate until such time as it becomes opportune to place the House of Saud on the Caliph’s throne.

France has two problems.  The obvious first one is with the Maggots; the second is with its limp-wristed allies.

Tags: , ,
Posted in terrorism | No Comments »